WP 12 : Normative parameters of exceptionalism: Community governance patterns in the field of security and its implications for a future global governance as responding to the internal rules of globalization, existing or to be
Latest addition – Tuesday 1 July 2008.
This package builds upon the expertise in ELISE and FORNET - 2 FP5 projects financed by DG Research. In the age of globalisation, several factors point to the regression of the State as the fundamental paradigm of our social/political being but still a type of association with a central role in providing safety and welfare for its citizens. Traditional institutions established at national level do not seem to be in a position to guarantee, on their own, efficient solutions against a series of transnational and widely diffused risks, ranging from health and environment protection to more (...)
This section's articles
-
26 December 2006, by Friedman David,
Hoppe Hans-Hermann,
Scandamis Nicholas
The most important question pertains to the crucial relationship between liberty and security. Nowhere in the two works is the issue considered in detail and in its implications. That is to say, there is no treatment of the relationship as a trade-off or otherwise. If one strictly follows libertarian principles, there is no way to determine a priori the specific terms of this relationship or whether it should be left to the free market to decide upon these terms.
-
4 March 2005, by University of Athens
Are there any normative patterns of globalisation regulating trade and population flows? Is a globalised borderless normative order already in place or is it gradually emerging and under which circumstances? What about the relations between an actual borderless normative order and EC Governance in the economic field? Is the EU Governance in terms of the security of the market a representative paradigm of security governance in a globalised world? Most importantly, what is the role of individual and new forms of subjectivity put forward in the context of globalisation? Which are the interactions and struggles between different techniques of exercising power as individualisation techniques and how do they relate to new forms of normativity in a borderless order?
-
30 November 2004, by Scandamis Nicholas
This package builds upon the expertise in ELISE and FORNET - 2 FP5 projects financed by DG Research. In the age of globalisation, several factors point to the regression of the State as the fundamental paradigm of our social/political being but still a type of association with a central role in providing safety and welfare for its citizens. Traditional institutions established at national level do not seem to be in a position to guarantee, on their own, efficient solutions against a series of transnational and widely diffused risks, ranging from health and environment protection to more traditional risks related to physical integrity and safety due to external force, as manifested by terrorism and specifically by the dramatic events of September 11.